On Monday, BBC Radio Norfolk – for whom I work in the day
job! – broadcast a documentary I made called Radio in a Roundabout Way. It was all about a programme called Roundabout East Anglia, which the BBC
broadcast from Norwich for the eastern counties in the 1970s, in the days
before there were BBC Local Radio stations in the region.
It’s a subject that appealed to me because it was a show that
had been forgotten by a lot of people, a story that hadn’t really been told
on-air before, and even in published sources only mentioned as the occasional footnote
in histories of Radio Norfolk. I’m something of an enthusiast of the history of
broadcasting in general and the BBC in particular, and the opportunity to
explore one of its lesser-told tales could not be resisted.
I worked hard on the programme, interviewed various
people who were kind enough to give up their time to dig into their memories, did a lot of research and managed to turn up a reasonable amount of
archive material that probably hadn’t been seen or heard by anybody for
decades. I was rather proud of the finished result, have had a lot of nice
feedback about it, and should anyone reading this fancy a listen, it’s still
available online until next Monday.
The reason I mention it here is because I have found over
the last couple of years that I rather enjoy making radio documentaries, and I
think I’m rather good at it. They’re not something you regularly get the
opportunity to work on in local radio, usually only cropping up on Bank
Holidays and over Christmas, things like that. But one of the advantages of the
small scale and informality of local radio is that, if you have a good enough
idea and go away and make something well, you can usually make a good case for
it being broadcast at some point.
I think I like making documentaries for much the same
reason I enjoy writing – and there is some writing involved, of course, in
scripting the links for a programme. (Although I think you should always have
as little narration as you think you can possibly get away with – which isn’t a
bad rule for writing either, when you should write as little as you need to in
order to tell the story). It’s all about piecing together a narrative, and in
making a documentary it’s much easier, for the simple reason that once you’ve
recorded all your interviews or found all your archive material, it’s all laid
out in front of you. You don’t have to write or create or struggle over
anything yourself – it all exists, you just have to cut it down, move it around
and put it into an order that works.
I can – and have – worked for hours at a time, sitting
down cutting interviews and archive into a series of fragments, then working
out what to discard and what to keep, and in what order it should all go. One
of the advantages of a radio documentary is that, also like writing, it can be
something of a solo pursuit – you don’t need teams of people to make a
documentary for the radio. You just need you and some editing software and some
patience and time.
I think, if I weren’t able to ever be a full-time writer,
I would happily take making radio documentaries for a living as a second
choice. Neither is particularly likely at the moment, but at least as things
stand I do occasionally get paid for documentary-making. I suppose you could
say a drawback of documentaries is that you’re always telling somebody else’s
narrative, not your own... But if your characters feel alive and real to you,
perhaps that should be what a novel is like anyway. Telling someone else’s
stories, and working out what to keep and what to discard, and how to tell the
story in the most economical but affecting fashion possible.
Do you know the really irritating thing, Paul? I'm a published writer, but I've only ever really wanted to work in radio.
ReplyDeleteWell, don't get me wrong, I very much enjoy working in radio and feel extremely lucky to be working for the BBC. It's just that I've always wanted to be a novelist.
Delete